The Ethics of Extreme Dog Breeding: A Controversial Debate

In the heart of the debate over “extreme dog breeding,” the iconic images of flat-faced French bulldogs and dachshunds with their distinctively short legs capture the public’s affection. Yet, beneath the surface of these endearing traits lies a concerning reality.

Animal welfare advocates across the United States and Europe are raising alarms over the health issues faced by dachshunds and other breeds, including severe breathing difficulties and musculoskeletal problems. These concerns have sparked a contentious dialogue about the ethics of breeding practices.

Legislative efforts to address these issues have gained momentum. In New Hampshire, legislators are considering a bill aimed at prohibiting the breeding of dogs with traits that lead to suffering, such as short noses characteristic of certain breeds. Similarly, in Germany, proposals to ban “cruel” breeding practices underscore a growing concern over the well-being of dogs subjected to genetic manipulation.

The debate has highlighted a critical question: Should breeding practices that prioritize aesthetic traits over health be allowed to continue?

Mark Wells, an assistant professor of philosophy at Northeastern University, emphasizes the ethical dilemmas posed by breeding for extreme physical characteristics. He points out a troubling trend where breeders may not intentionally harm animals, yet the normalization of health issues indicates a problem.

Kennel associations have vehemently opposed regulatory efforts, labeling proponents of legislation as “extremists.” The American Kennel Club and the German Kennel Club have been especially outspoken in defense of breeds like dachshunds, launching petitions to “save our favorite dogs.”

The concept of “torture breeding,” associated with breeding dogs with extreme physical traits, has come under scrutiny. Terri Bright, an assistant psychology professor at Northeastern, has observed significant changes in the appearance of dog breeds over the past century, pointing to a trend of breeding for aesthetics at the expense of health.

Bright and Wells suggest that education and a shift in public perception towards prioritizing health over aesthetics could be key in addressing these issues. They advocate for reimagining breed standards for better health outcomes.

This debate on extreme breeding challenges our beauty ideals and urges us to reflect on the ethics of our preferences. It amplifies the call for responsible practices prioritizing dog health and welfare, ultimately aiming to create a healthier future for our beloved canine companions.